Tag: captivity-informed care
Captivity-Informed Care is a survivor-authored approach to care that asks whether the conditions of help increase the survivor’s usable freedom or reproduce captivity through dependency, intrusion, controlled interpretation, punishment for differentiation, or loss of independent reality.
It builds on trauma-informed care while adding questions about power, constrained exit, conditional belonging, interpretive authority, coercive systems, continuity of care, sacred boundaries, and the survivor’s ability to refuse, disagree, pause, leave, or seek another source of help.
Captivity-informed care treats survivor self-report as primary knowledge of lived experience while preserving the appropriate role of clinical, pastoral, institutional, or other professional expertise.
Its central ethical question is not only whether care feels supportive, but whether the relationship protects agency, differentiation, sovereignty, consent, and access to life beyond the helping system.
Care must not reproduce captivity.
-
When Distress Does Not Look Like Distress
Severe distress does not always announce itself through visible collapse. A survivor may remain articulate, thoughtful, productive, relationally responsive, and capable of advocating for themselves while experiencing profound physiological—even suicidal—distress. The continued presence of those capacities does not establish that…
-
Care Must Move at the Speed of Safety
Helping fields often have an implicit direction of travel. Speak. Remember. Process. Disclose. Engage. Try. Return. Reconcile. Progress. The movement may be clinically appropriate. The destination may be good. But the pace can still be wrong. For a person shaped…
